zigling-exercises.git/exercises/108_labeled_switch.zig, branch mainMy copy of the Zigling exercises and their solutions. See the original at https://codeberg.org/ziglings/exercises
https://git.muftee.net/zigling-exercises.git/atom?h=main2026-04-03T11:35:56ZInsert space for additional async exercises2026-04-03T11:35:56ZChris Boeschchrboesch@noreply.codeberg.org2026-04-03T11:35:56Zurn:sha1:e0259f43a726f61da14686de802021fcdb9aacd0108: .2025-05-31T23:08:07Zfelixrabefelixrabe@noreply.codeberg.org2025-05-31T23:08:07Zurn:sha1:b1223f92edd6d488d491125dd6d415dc915707b4108: Make pretty2025-05-31T23:05:37Zfelixrabefelixrabe@noreply.codeberg.org2025-05-31T23:05:22Zurn:sha1:91f1c045bcd33e43f2723ed5b8a159c85f54acb0fix: typos2025-03-20T20:24:40ZJost Alemannjost_alemann@me.com2025-03-20T20:24:40Zurn:sha1:522b4673a426258d1299abd75021a9510644f9baUpdate exercises/108_labeled_switch.zig2025-01-08T13:22:29Zchrboeschchrboesch@noreply.codeberg.org2025-01-08T13:22:29Zurn:sha1:90d05995b5d5453bfed4eef2547dd31efa3af412
Fixed an error in the debug statement and made the text a bit more coherent.
Signed-off-by: chrboesch <chrboesch@noreply.codeberg.org>Update exercises/108_labeled_switch.zig2025-01-08T12:18:25Zchrboeschchrboesch@noreply.codeberg.org2025-01-08T12:18:25Zurn:sha1:54f743ba43630a452f8104b5b21fbbcdeefe866f
The sentence was slightly unclear
Signed-off-by: chrboesch <chrboesch@noreply.codeberg.org>Fix a typo: we need do we need to -> we need to2025-01-07T18:00:16Zmikkuroguemikkurogue@noreply.codeberg.org2025-01-07T18:00:16Zurn:sha1:87b258d0a90af4cf5e16986226b589c2a541db32
Morning delirium does not help when looking at lots of words
Update: Remove the 4th branch in favour of just making that the else branch2025-01-07T10:15:59Zmikkuroguemikkurogue@noreply.codeberg.org2025-01-07T10:15:59Zurn:sha1:5cdaee74205e97da127d749b07cbe6e64ba6a940
Probably easier to not have an "unused" branch that returns the same as the else branch in the example.
Signed-off-by: mikkurogue <mikkurogue@noreply.codeberg.org>Update: 108 Labeled switch example to contain default case for exhaustion2025-01-04T11:56:25Zmikkuroguemichael.lindemans@outlook.com2025-01-04T11:56:25Zurn:sha1:de353bcb3b6d7ef59bcf1ceb0a326ab6e5a4139f
Update example text to give clarity on default/exhaustive case.
Reasoning:
The input for the example will not compile if user would want to test this for the logic of a labeled switch. Due the input not being an exhaustive input but rather "any u8 integer" (for the lack of better terminology) we need to use the else branch to indicate that the default case is handled, in this case by just emulating the '4' branch, but this could return an error.InvalidCaseProvided for example.
Signed-off-by: mikkurogue <michael.lindemans@outlook.com>Minor improvements.2024-09-20T10:10:55ZChris Boeschchrboesch@noreply.codeberg.org2024-09-20T10:10:55Zurn:sha1:d1b49f353eaa7358a4041a3090e87f49dc0a4bf6